DNA, Death Row and Supreme Court
Supreme Court divided over death row right to DNA evidence testing
The Supreme Court on Monday was divided over whether a Texas man on death row has a legal right to sue, known as standing, to bring federal civil rights claims challenging the constitutionality of the Texas laws governing DNA testing.
Hampton Dellinger, head of the Office of Special Counsel, sued the Trump administration earlier this month after the ...
This article was updated on Feb. 6 at 2:04 p.m. Shortly after being sworn into office on Jan. 20 for a second term, President ...
Just more than a week from four months since the Nov. 5 election, North Carolina has the only unresolved race in the nation.
President Donald Trump has expounded an extraordinary vision of his authority over the past month, relying on the Supreme ...
An X post from the Tennessee Attorney General's Office called the Supreme Court's decision not to hear the case, ""Another ...
The case involves major constitutional questions about presidential power—but its unusual posture could make it a dud.
While other factors are also at play since the ruling, the number of Hispanic medical students from Illinois plummeted by ...
The justices unanimously ruled that the plaintiffs had not established a connection to the United States required by the ...
A lawyer argues that the Supreme Court must stand up to the Trump Administration and preserve the rule of law.
U.S. Supreme Court rules that Alabama cannot deny citizens the ability to sue over delays and errors in processing ...
The justices have all but stopped issuing summary reversals, which are unsigned decisions used to correct clear errors by ...
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results
Feedback