The Thomson Reuters decision has big implications for the battle between generative AI companies and rights holders.

Legal experts said there are key differences in Thomson Reuters' case against Ross Intelligence and other major AI-related ...

After reconsidering the case, the judge issued a partial summary judgement, which asks whether a non-generative AI system’s ...

A judge looked at possible copyright infringement defenses for Ross Intelligence and said, ‘I reject them all.’ ...

Tech companies argue that generative AI systems make fair use of copyrighted ... content that threatens their livelihoods. A Thomson Reuters spokesperson welcomed the decision.

In an early test case for copyright holders bringing claims related to content used to train artificial intelligence, a ...

The judge rules that replicating human-authored content without permission does not qualify as 'fair use' of AI under copyright law.

Join our daily and weekly newsletters for the latest updates and exclusive content on industry-leading AI coverage. Learn More Thomson Reuters is bringing AI to tax professionals in a big way.

Thomson Reuters scored an early victory in an AI-related copyright case against Ross Intelligence. The ruling highlights fair use limits. Fair use is at the center of ongoing AI copyright lawsuits.

Thomson Reuters has won an early battle in court over the question of fair use in artificial intelligence-related copyright ...