A federal judge on Tuesday largely sided with Google in the penalties phase of its search monopoly case, declining to order the breakup sought by the Department of Justice (DOJ). U.S.

Google is barred from having exclusive contracts for its search, Chrome, Google Assistant, and Gemini app products, but doesn't have to sell Chrome.

A federal judge ruled against breaking up Google, but is barring it from making exclusive deals to make its search engine the default on phones and other devices.

DC District Court Judge Amit Mehta has ruled that Google doesn't have to give up the Chrome browser to mitigate its illegal monopoly in online search. The court will only require a handful of modest ...

U.S. District Judge Mehta ruled that Google can no longer pay partners to make its search engine available exclusively on ...

Google will not have to sell its Chrome browser in order to address its illegal monopoly in online search, DC District Court ...

Alphabet surged past a $3 trillion market cap after U.S. courts imposed softer-than-expected antitrust remedies, preserving ...

Google dodged a bullet in its antitrust case, as the company will not have to sell off Chrome and can remain the default ...

Google has avoided the government's toughest demand in a landmark antitrust case — selling off its Chrome browser — but new ...

Google scored a much-needed win Tuesday when a federal judge ruled the tech giant could hold on to its Chrome browser, ...

In a landmark case – the USA vs. Google LLC – a ruling in federal court in August, 2024, declared Google to be a monopoly.

A federal judge in the DOJ antitrust case ruled that Google must share its search data and end its use of exclusive contracts.